Firefighting foam has caused numerous airports to file civil lawsuits to recover damages and costs related to decades of use. U.S. District Richard M. Gergel presides over most of these lawsuits in the AFFF MDL. Judge Gergel is coordinating pretrial matters to prepare for settlement or trial. Airports filed claims relating to per- or polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). Airports contend aqueous film-forming foams (AFFFs) polluted airport property and groundwater because firefighting foam was employed to extinguish liquid fuel fires.

Firefighting Foam Pollutes Airports

Federal law requires airports to provide aircraft rescue and firefighting (ARFF) services during operation. Airport fire-fighting personnel trained with firefighting foam containing two types of PFAS, PFOA or PFOS. For decades, FAA regulations mandated the discharge of firefighting foam in training exercises. This changed on January 17, 2018, when the FAA issued new guidance to assist airports seeking to manage environmental, liability, and community risks associated firefighting foam. The FAA announced that airport operators could begin using 3 new testing systems for fire-fighting equipment that do not involve dispensing foam. The public health risks associated with contamination of groundwater by PFAS drove the decision of the FFA.

Airport Response to Pollution

The National Academy of Sciences published a report recommending airport action to identify and cleanup firefighting foam pollution. “Use and Potential Impacts of AFFF Containing PFASs at Airports” (2017) provides the following:

Airport Settlements

Presently, no nationwide agreement exists to settle with the manufactures of firefighting foam. However, airports filing suit against the manufactures and distributors of firefighting foam are in the best position to reach a settlement to recover funds necessary to test and cleanup airport property and groundwater. Lawsuits allow the parties to gather evidence in preparation for trial. Trials drive settlements. Therefore, attorneys representing airports recommend filing lawsuits to fund cleanups of airport property contaminated with PFAS.

OUR team

We prefer doing to talking (except in court), We take the bull by the horns and give you clear and practical advice. Personal, to the point, and in plain language. Any questions? Feel free to call or to drop by.

After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.
After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.

$1.056 billion verdict against Exxon Mobil

If you think you may have a claim and need legal help to hold those parties responsible for damage that they have caused, contact an attorney from our firm.

Stag Liuzza fights industry giants across the country and holds them accountable for their actions. We strive to ensure that communities have access to safe drinking water, clean air, and a healthy environment. is operated and provided by Stag Liuzza, LLC responsible attorneys Michael G. Stag and Ashley M. Liuzza. Stag Liuzza, LLC is officed in New Orleans, LA, and our attorneys are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi.

Nothing on this site should be taken to establish an attorney-client relationship with us unless and until a contract for representation is signed. The attorneys of Stag Liuzza are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi and may associate counsel licensed in other jurisdictions as necessary.

Past results do not guarantee any similar result or outcome in your claim. Each claim is different.

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.