The 3M PFAS settlement is a significant development for public water systems (PWS) across the United States. This monumental agreement, primarily aimed at addressing contamination caused by per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), will provide substantial financial relief to impacted water systems. Large water systems will be paid millions of dollars to offset costs related to PFAS treatment. You can estimate your PWS settlement payout with the Estimated Settlement Range Table at our clean groundwater website. This article breaks down the essentials of the 3M PFAS settlement, including the difference between Phase One and Phase Two settlement claimants.

Understanding the 3M PFAS Settlement

The 3M PFAS settlement is set to pay out $10.3 – 12.5 billion over a 13-year period. 3M will pay this money to public water systems in exchange for the release of all PFAS liabilities owed to public water systems. Because it is a court approved class action settlement, public water systems that did not opt out by the court ordered deadlines, have settled their claims. They have released their claims against 3M and can only receive money through this settlement. The settlement pays for costs related to the removal of PFAS from water supplies. The settlement distributes funds among various PWS based on the extent of contamination and the relative size of the water system.

Documentation Required to Submit a Claim

To submit a claim to the 3M AFFF water settlement, public water systems must provide specific documentation. Essential documents include:

The claims administrator requires accurate and comprehensive documentation to process the claim. Attorneys with a deep understanding of the settlement agreement may be helpful to secure the maximum possible compensation available to the water system.

Phase One vs. Phase Two Settlement Claimants

Understanding the distinction between Phase One and Phase Two claimants is essential for navigating the 3M PFAS settlement process.

Phase One Claimants:

Phase Two Claimants:

By differentiating between these phases, the settlement aims to address both current and potential future contamination issues effectively.

Conclusion

The 3M PFAS settlement represents a crucial step forward in addressing the widespread issue of PFAS contamination in public water systems. By understanding the settlement’s financial scope, required documentation, and the distinction between Phase One and Phase Two claimants, PWS can better navigate the claims process. For more detailed information and resources, visit cleangroundwater.com.

OUR team

We prefer doing to talking (except in court), We take the bull by the horns and give you clear and practical advice. Personal, to the point, and in plain language. Any questions? Feel free to call or to drop by.

After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.
After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.

$1.056 billion verdict against Exxon Mobil

If you think you may have a claim and need legal help to hold those parties responsible for damage that they have caused, contact an attorney from our firm.

Stag Liuzza fights industry giants across the country and holds them accountable for their actions. We strive to ensure that communities have access to safe drinking water, clean air, and a healthy environment.

stagliuzza.com is operated and provided by Stag Liuzza, LLC responsible attorneys Michael G. Stag and Ashley M. Liuzza. Stag Liuzza, LLC is officed in New Orleans, LA, and our attorneys are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi.

Nothing on this site should be taken to establish an attorney-client relationship with us unless and until a contract for representation is signed. The attorneys of Stag Liuzza are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi and may associate counsel licensed in other jurisdictions as necessary.

Past results do not guarantee any similar result or outcome in your claim. Each claim is different.

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.