The Journal of Environmental Pollution recently published a study investigating the ramifications of the “Halliburton Loophole” on chemical disclosure in US fracking operations. This summary highlights the study’s key findings, emphasizing the consequences of non-disclosure and the potential risks to public health and the environment.


Hydraulic fracturing, commonly known as fracking, is a widely employed method for extracting natural gas and oil from underground rock formations. However, concerns persist regarding the potential environmental and health impacts associated with the chemicals used during the fracking process. The Safe Drinking Water Act (SDWA) mandates the disclosure of these chemicals; however, an exemption called the “Halliburton Loophole” permits companies to keep certain chemicals as proprietary information, thus evading full transparency.


The study conducted an extensive analysis of fracking disclosures spanning the years 2014 to 2021, comparing the reported chemicals with those regulated under the SDWA. Its objective was to assess the extent to which the Halliburton Loophole facilitated non-disclosure of chemicals deemed hazardous under the SDWA.


Limited Disclosures of Hazardous Chemicals: The study revealed that approximately 15% of the chemicals used in fracking operations remained undisclosed due to the Halliburton Loophole. These undisclosed chemicals included substances recognized as hazardous to human health and the environment.

Potentially Harmful Chemicals: Among the undisclosed chemicals, researchers identified several substances associated with potential health risks. These substances comprised known or suspected carcinogens, reproductive toxins, and endocrine disruptors. The presence of such chemicals in fracking operations raises concerns about their impact on local water sources and public health.

Regulatory Discrepancies: The study shed light on a significant discrepancy between chemicals reported under the SDWA and those actually employed in fracking operations. This discrepancy suggests that the existing regulatory framework fails to effectively capture all the chemicals utilized during the fracking process, potentially leaving gaps in understanding the true environmental and health risks associated with the industry.

Lack of Transparency: The Halliburton Loophole perpetuates a lack of transparency within the fracking industry. Non-disclosure of certain chemicals prevents communities and regulatory agencies from making informed decisions regarding the potential risks associated with fracking operations. This information gap impedes the ability to effectively manage and mitigate environmental and health impacts.

Implications for Safe Drinking Water: The study emphasizes the potential threats to drinking water sources posed by undisclosed fracking chemicals. These substances have the capacity to contaminate groundwater, adversely affecting the quality and safety of drinking water supplies for nearby communities.


The study’s findings underscore the concerning outcomes resulting from the Halliburton Loophole and its impact on the disclosure of chemicals regulated under the SDWA within the fracking industry. The non-disclosure of hazardous chemicals, including those with potential health risks, along with the regulatory discrepancies and lack of transparency associated with the loophole, raise significant concerns. The implications extend to the potential contamination of drinking water sources, further highlighting the urgency of improved regulation and oversight of fracking activities to safeguard public health and the environment.

Moving forward, it is crucial for policymakers, regulatory agencies, and the fracking industry to address these issues promptly. Enhancing transparency, closing regulatory gaps, and prioritizing the protection of water resources and public health are essential. Increased scrutiny and regulation can contribute to a more sustainable and responsible approach to fracking, minimizing potential harm and ensuring the well-being of communities affected by these operations.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

OUR team

We prefer doing to talking (except in court), We take the bull by the horns and give you clear and practical advice. Personal, to the point, and in plain language. Any questions? Feel free to call or to drop by.

After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.
After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.

$1.056 billion verdict against Exxon Mobil

If you think you may have a claim and need legal help to hold those parties responsible for damage that they have caused, contact an attorney from our firm.

Stag Liuzza fights industry giants across the country and holds them accountable for their actions. We strive to ensure that communities have access to safe drinking water, clean air, and a healthy environment. is operated and provided by Stag Liuzza, LLC responsible attorneys Michael G. Stag and Ashley M. Liuzza. Stag Liuzza, LLC is officed in New Orleans, LA, and our attorneys are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi.

Nothing on this site should be taken to establish an attorney-client relationship with us unless and until a contract for representation is signed. The attorneys of Stag Liuzza are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi and may associate counsel licensed in other jurisdictions as necessary.

Past results do not guarantee any similar result or outcome in your claim. Each claim is different.

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.