On June 22, 2023, the United States Supreme Court in a 5-4 decision held that the 1868 treaty does not require the United States to take affirmative action to secure water rights for the Navajo Nation.

Background of the case:

The court held that the federal government is not required to take affirmative action to ensure water for the Navajo Nation. While the court agreed that the treaty reserved water for the Navajo Nation, the court concluded that this did not mean the United States had to take affirmative steps to secure water for the Navajo. Additionally, the court acknowledged that the 1868 treaty secured a permanent home for the Navajo, but the court did not find that securing a permanent home requires affirmative action to secure water.

The court’s decision:

The court held that the federal government is not required to take affirmative action to ensure water for the Navajo Nation. While the court agreed that the treaty reserved water for the Navajo Nation, the court concluded that this did not mean the United States had to take affirmative steps to secure water for the Navajo. Additionally, the court acknowledged that the 1868 treaty secured a permanent home for the Navajo, but the court did not find that securing a permanent home requires affirmative action to secure water.

Implications:

Arizona v. Navajo Nation is one example where the United States has used the law to push aside the rights of indigenous communities. This case is a major setback for the Navajo Nation as this decision further pushes the United States out of promises made to Tribal Nations. As a result of this holding, the Navajo Nation lacks clean water and legal advocacy.

Writing for the dissenting opinion, Justice Gorsuch stated that the Navajo nation has tried everything to receive justice. His hope moving forward is that the Navajo may be involved in future litigation on water rights. While this does provide a glimpse of hope, the Navajo are left in a familiar spot throughout history, lacking justice and facing adverse living conditions.

OUR team

We prefer doing to talking (except in court), We take the bull by the horns and give you clear and practical advice. Personal, to the point, and in plain language. Any questions? Feel free to call or to drop by.

After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.
After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.

$1.056 billion verdict against Exxon Mobil

If you think you may have a claim and need legal help to hold those parties responsible for damage that they have caused, contact an attorney from our firm.

Stag Liuzza fights industry giants across the country and holds them accountable for their actions. We strive to ensure that communities have access to safe drinking water, clean air, and a healthy environment.

stagliuzza.com is operated and provided by Stag Liuzza, LLC responsible attorneys Michael G. Stag and Ashley M. Liuzza. Stag Liuzza, LLC is officed in New Orleans, LA, and our attorneys are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi.

Nothing on this site should be taken to establish an attorney-client relationship with us unless and until a contract for representation is signed. The attorneys of Stag Liuzza are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi and may associate counsel licensed in other jurisdictions as necessary.

Past results do not guarantee any similar result or outcome in your claim. Each claim is different.

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.