Last month, Judge Gergel conducted a hearing on a very important issue in the Aqueous Film Forming Foams (“AFFF”) litigation: the government contractor defense.

What is the government contractor defense?

The government contractor defense is a defense that defendants assert to avoid liability. It essentially says that contractors doing business with the government may not be liable for harm caused by their products if the government has approved of the products it uses.

How does it apply in this case?

Defendants in the AFFF litigation are manufacturers of AFFF and manufacturers of chemicals used in AFFF. The government has used defendants’ AFFF at military bases around the United States since the 1970’s. In 2018, the government discontinued certain types of AFFF after realizing its risks of harm.

Last year, defendants filed a motion to dismiss a majority of AFFF cases based on the government contractor defense. The parties briefed their positions and Judge Gergel conducted a hearing last month.

Defendants’ position

Defendants maintain the position that AFFF is not harmful to human health or the environment. Defendants claim that the government knew about any risks of AFFF. Even with this knowledge, the government authorized the use of the AFFF. Therefore, defendants believe that the government contractor defense shields them from liability for harm their products have caused.

Plaintiffs’ position

Plaintiffs argue that defendants knew more about the risks of AFFF than they let on. If defendants had provided the government with studies showing that AFFF is harmful, the government would have decided to discontinue the use of AFFF sooner. Defendants’ delay in disclosure of risks contributed to the delay in the government’s decision to discontinue use of certain types of AFFF in 2018.

What happened at the hearing?

Both parties argued their positions at the hearing. Judge Gergel dd not rule at that time. But he did order the parties to submit additional information after the hearing. The requested information concerns past studies on the safety of AFFF. This will help him determine what defendants knew and when they knew it. This is important in determining what the government knew or should have known.

Judge Gergel’s ruling will have a huge impact on the litigation. We believe the hearing went well for plaintiffs. We are hopeful Judge Gergel will rule in our favor.

OUR team

We prefer doing to talking (except in court), We take the bull by the horns and give you clear and practical advice. Personal, to the point, and in plain language. Any questions? Feel free to call or to drop by.

After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.
After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.

$1.056 billion verdict against Exxon Mobil

If you think you may have a claim and need legal help to hold those parties responsible for damage that they have caused, contact an attorney from our firm.

Stag Liuzza fights industry giants across the country and holds them accountable for their actions. We strive to ensure that communities have access to safe drinking water, clean air, and a healthy environment. is operated and provided by Stag Liuzza, LLC responsible attorneys Michael G. Stag and Ashley M. Liuzza. Stag Liuzza, LLC is officed in New Orleans, LA, and our attorneys are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi.

Nothing on this site should be taken to establish an attorney-client relationship with us unless and until a contract for representation is signed. The attorneys of Stag Liuzza are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi and may associate counsel licensed in other jurisdictions as necessary.

Past results do not guarantee any similar result or outcome in your claim. Each claim is different.

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.