The British Medical Journal recently published a new study titled “Cancer Mortality and Low Dose Radiation.” The goal of the study was to explore effects of radiation, especially low doses, on the risk of developing cancer.

Research Design: A Multinational Approach

A comprehensive multinational cohort study forms the basis of this paper. This means that they study involved multiple countries working together. France, the UK, and the US were the three nations that participated. The focus was specific. It looked at workers in the nuclear industry. This study is known as the International Nuclear Workers Study, frequently referred to by the acronym INWORKS.

Participants: A Large Group with Specific Criteria

The number of participants in this study was vast. A total of 309,932 workers took part. Each of these workers had individual data that showed external exposure to ionizing radiation. This was also not a short-term study. The researchers tracked these workers for 10.7 million person years.

Key Outcomes: What Was Measured

The primary measure or outcome was specific. The researchers wanted to know one thing. How does the rate of cancer mortality change with every gray (Gy) of radiation dose? This was the key question they aimed to answer.

Results: Important Findings

A lot of data came from the INWORKS study. For example, the total number of deaths observed was 103,553. Out of these, a significant portion was due to solid tumor cancers. Specifically, 28,089 deaths were because of this type of cancer. One of the main findings was about the mortality rate. Importantly, as the cumulative dose of radiation increased, so did the mortality rate from solid tumor cancers. For every additional Gy of radiation, the rate went up by 52%. This increase had a confidence interval that ranged from 27% to 77%.

There was another interesting observation. The researchers looked at a specific range of doses, namely the low cumulative dose range between 0-100 mGy. In this range, the estimate of the association approximately doubled. Another aspect they considered was specific types of cancer. They excluded deaths from lung and pleural cancers. The reason was to see if these cancers had a significant effect on the results. The finding was that removing these deaths only had a small impact. Therefore, this meant that factors like smoking or asbestos exposure didn’t majorly affect the main findings.

Conclusions: The Bigger Picture

The research added to the INWORKS findings. It provided a clearer picture of the link between radiation and cancer. Specifically, it showed the relationship between prolonged low dose radiation and deaths from solid cancers.

One significant conclusion was about current estimates. The research found that the rate of solid cancer mortality per Gy was higher. It was even higher than what current radiation protection guidelines suggest.

Another important conclusion was about the dose-response association. The research found something interesting. At low doses of radiation, the dose-response association was steeper even when compared to the full range of doses. This finding has big implications. It means that even low doses of radiation can have a significant impact.

Implications and Final Thoughts

The findings of this research are crucial. They are especially important for workers in the nuclear industry. But they also matter for the general public. Various settings in general expose people to low doses of radiation. This includes medical settings, workplaces, airplane flights, and even some natural environments. Therefore research shows that we need better protection measures against radiation. It’s not just about the high doses. Even low doses can have a significant impact on our health.

OUR team

We prefer doing to talking (except in court), We take the bull by the horns and give you clear and practical advice. Personal, to the point, and in plain language. Any questions? Feel free to call or to drop by.

After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.
After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.

$1.056 billion verdict against Exxon Mobil

If you think you may have a claim and need legal help to hold those parties responsible for damage that they have caused, contact an attorney from our firm.

Stag Liuzza fights industry giants across the country and holds them accountable for their actions. We strive to ensure that communities have access to safe drinking water, clean air, and a healthy environment. is operated and provided by Stag Liuzza, LLC responsible attorneys Michael G. Stag and Ashley M. Liuzza. Stag Liuzza, LLC is officed in New Orleans, LA, and our attorneys are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi.

Nothing on this site should be taken to establish an attorney-client relationship with us unless and until a contract for representation is signed. The attorneys of Stag Liuzza are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi and may associate counsel licensed in other jurisdictions as necessary.

Past results do not guarantee any similar result or outcome in your claim. Each claim is different.

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.