New Kid on the Block

A new standardized exam, JD-Next, whose proponents say, unlike the long-dominant Law School Admission Test, predicts academic success with little score disparities for under-represented groups. This could be a massive change to law school admissions, especially in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court’s June decision banning race-conscious admissions. In fact, 47 accredited U.S. law schools have been granted permission by the American Bar Association to use JD-Next in place of the LSAT in admissions decisions going forward.

Consultation and conference of professional businesswoman and Male lawyers working and discussion having at law firm in office. Concepts of law, Judge gavel with scales of justice.

Admissions Council Unconcerned

The Law School Admission Council, which administers the LSAT, sounds skeptical about its new competitor. They say there is so little hard data about JD-Next that it is premature to speculate. Additionally they add that based on their data, there is no evidence that JD-Next can serve as an admission assessment.


According to JD-Next, more than 2,000 students have completed the course, which was initially offered as a bridge to prepare incoming law students. Its data, replicated across several years and by two different teams of analysts, has shown no significant racial disparities to date in its exam results.

Differences in Methodology

The LSAT measures reading comprehension and logical analysis, but doesn’t quiz applicants on specific legal knowledge or concepts. JD-Next, however, enrolls prospective law students in an 8-week online class similar to a first-year contracts course, then tests them on what they learned. JD-Next states that the focus is on assessing whether the students can do the sorts of legal analysis introduced in the course. They do so because this type of legal analysis will ultimately be the backbone of their law school performance.

The Coursework

Students in JD-Next take regular online quizzes on lectures and learn how to brief cases, posting their work to a virtual discussion board for feedback. All told, students are expected to spend about six hours a week on the class.

OUR team

We prefer doing to talking (except in court), We take the bull by the horns and give you clear and practical advice. Personal, to the point, and in plain language. Any questions? Feel free to call or to drop by.

After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.
After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.

$1.056 billion verdict against Exxon Mobil

If you think you may have a claim and need legal help to hold those parties responsible for damage that they have caused, contact an attorney from our firm.

Stag Liuzza fights industry giants across the country and holds them accountable for their actions. We strive to ensure that communities have access to safe drinking water, clean air, and a healthy environment. is operated and provided by Stag Liuzza, LLC responsible attorneys Michael G. Stag and Ashley M. Liuzza. Stag Liuzza, LLC is officed in New Orleans, LA, and our attorneys are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi.

Nothing on this site should be taken to establish an attorney-client relationship with us unless and until a contract for representation is signed. The attorneys of Stag Liuzza are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi and may associate counsel licensed in other jurisdictions as necessary.

Past results do not guarantee any similar result or outcome in your claim. Each claim is different.

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.