Lawsuits involving injuries sustained as a result of using certain ventilators, CPAP, and BiPAP machines are consolidated in a Multidistrict litigation (“MDL”) before Judge Joy Flowers Conti in Federal Court in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.  Last week, Judge Conti granted approval of a class action settlement to resolve economic loss claims against the manufacturer, Philips Respironics (“Philips”).

What are ventilators, CPAP, and BiPAP machines?

Ventilators, CPAP, and BiPAP machines are devices that help people breath. They are prescribed to people with respiratory insufficiency, respiratory failure, or sleep apnea. Specifically, CPAP machines help people breath by providing consistent air pressure when breathing in or out. Alternatively, BiPAP machines pump air into the lungs at differing pressure when inhaling and exhaling. Further, ventilators move air in and out of the lungs in people who cannot breathe on their own.

What are the lawsuits about?

Philips manufactured several types of ventilators, CPAP, and BiPAP machines that were recalled in 2021. The recall was initiated after Philips realized that polyester foam in the breathing devices degrades and becomes toxic. Subsequently, Philips recalled additional BIPAP machines because they contained contaminated plastic.  Use of affected devices could lead to serious injuries such as infections, immune system reactions, pneumonia, and cancer. Finally, the FDA reached an agreement with Philips prohibiting Philips from selling the machines in the United States.

What is the settlement about?

The settlement pertains to economic loss as a result of using certain ventilators, CPAP, and BiPAP machines. It does not pertain to any allegations of personal injuries related to the devices. Anyone who leased, rented, or was prescribed a recalled device from 2008 to June 2021 may be entitled to an award.

What products are included in the settlement?

People who used the following devices may be eligible for an award: System One, C-Series S/T, AVAPS, Dream Station, E3, OmniLab Advanced Plus, Trilogy 100/200, Garbin Plus, Aeris LiveVent, and V30 Auto. A full list of serial numbers may be found on the settlement website.

How much are cases worth?

Payment ranges depend on the type of device used. Additionally, payments may be available for returning devices to Philips. Further, awards are available to people who paid to replace their recalled device at their own expense.

How do I enroll in the settlement?

Claimants have until August 2024 to enroll in the settlement. Enrollment directions and full settlement details can be found here: www.RespironicsCPAP-ELSettlement.com

OUR team

We prefer doing to talking (except in court), We take the bull by the horns and give you clear and practical advice. Personal, to the point, and in plain language. Any questions? Feel free to call or to drop by.

After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.
After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.

$1.056 billion verdict against Exxon Mobil

If you think you may have a claim and need legal help to hold those parties responsible for damage that they have caused, contact an attorney from our firm.

Stag Liuzza fights industry giants across the country and holds them accountable for their actions. We strive to ensure that communities have access to safe drinking water, clean air, and a healthy environment.

stagliuzza.com is operated and provided by Stag Liuzza, LLC responsible attorneys Michael G. Stag and Ashley M. Liuzza. Stag Liuzza, LLC is officed in New Orleans, LA, and our attorneys are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi.

Nothing on this site should be taken to establish an attorney-client relationship with us unless and until a contract for representation is signed. The attorneys of Stag Liuzza are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi and may associate counsel licensed in other jurisdictions as necessary.

Past results do not guarantee any similar result or outcome in your claim. Each claim is different.

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.