[BY DAVID MITCHELL]
A state district judge sent critical air permits for a $9.4 billion Formosa Plastics complex back to state environmental regulators so they can take a closer look at the St. James Parish facility’s emissions impacts on Black residents living nearby.

Nineteenth Judicial District Judge Trudy White issued the finding during a hearing Wednesday, telling the state Department of Environmental Quality to more properly evaluate the environmental justice questions surrounding the project, plaintiff’s attorneys said.

White ruled two weeks after the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers announced it would be suspending its wetlands permit for the facility along the Mississippi River to review its own analysis of alternative sites and failure to look at potential sites in neighboring Ascension Parish.

Formosa officials said White’s ruling did not suspend the air permits in the interim, but her ruling does add another layer of uncertainty for a project that is expected to create 1,200 permanent jobs, tens of millions of dollars per year in state and local taxes, and millions more in spinoff benefits once built.

Along with the Corps wetland permits and a local land use permit, the state air permits allow FG LA, the Formosa Plastics affiliate behind the project, to operate and help clear the path to significant construction investment.

Janile Parks, spokeswoman for FG LA, noted the “Court appears to have ruled on the merits of the case before all parties in the matter — including FG and LDEQ — had filed briefs detailing the facts.”

Parks called DEQ’s air permits “sound.” “FG intends to explore all legal options,” she said.

The Corps’ decision earlier this month had already halted major construction activities.

The setbacks in court for FG come as St. James officials are preparing for major tax revenue and employment losses with the imminent closure of Shell’s Convent oil refinery, a mainstay of jobs and tax revenue in the parish since the late 1960s.

During a Zoom hearing Wednesday, White told attorneys and others that environmental racism exists and operates through the state’s institutions — through personnel, policies, practices, structures, and history, intentional or unintentional, according to notes shared by the plaintiffs’ lawyers. A staff attorney for White did not dispute the plaintiffs’ recitation of the judge’s words.

White also told DEQ and company lawyers that the air permits must have a complete environmental justice analysis and that DEQ did not balance pollution health risks with reasonable certainty, saying the agency made a conclusion without analysis.

White’s ruling was verbal, and a written decision had not been issued by Wednesday evening.

Gov. John Bel Edwards and local officials have supported the plant since it was announced in 2018, but it has faced considerable opposition from residents, local community groups, and national environmental organizations campaigning against the plant and plastics production in general.

They have attacked the project in public meetings and in court over the disproportionate pollution impact they say the facility would add on long-standing, rural African American communities in western St. James. The discovery of what may be plantation-era graves on the fringes of that site that could hold the bodies of slaves has only ratcheted up those concerns.

White’s ruling resulted from a February state court challenge to the air permits. The effect of the proposed air emissions and the alleged paucity of DEQ’s environmental justice analysis were major features of the legal challenge.

State courts in East Baton Rouge Parish are the venue for appeals of DEQ decisions statewide.

“We are thrilled that the court saw the serious deficiencies in the agency’s anemic environmental justice analysis, some of which we presented, and told the agency that it needs to seriously consider the health impacts of this massive proposal,” said Lisa Jordan, director of the Tulane Environmental Law Clinic.
The clinic represents St. James Parish resident Beverly Alexander, who intervened in the state court suit and whose arguments over DEQ’s environmental justice analysis prompted the hearing that led to the ruling Wednesday.

Relying on a Tulane clinic analysis, Alexander alleged that DEQ erroneously asserted that key air pollutants in the area around the plant site had decreased since 2015 when Tulane had found they increased.

The clinic also alleged that DEQ used outdated, 2011 cancer risk and respiratory hazard data to do a required environmental justice assessment of the plant. That area of St. James is slated for a significant influx of new industrial facilities besides Formosa.

In prior filings, the plaintiffs had also raised other questions about the strength of DEQ’s analysis of impact on the area.

OUR team

We prefer doing to talking (except in court), We take the bull by the horns and give you clear and practical advice. Personal, to the point, and in plain language. Any questions? Feel free to call or to drop by.

After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.
After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.

$1.056 billion verdict against Exxon Mobil

If you think you may have a claim and need legal help to hold those parties responsible for damage that they have caused, contact an attorney from our firm.

Stag Liuzza fights industry giants across the country and holds them accountable for their actions. We strive to ensure that communities have access to safe drinking water, clean air, and a healthy environment.

stagliuzza.com is operated and provided by Stag Liuzza, LLC responsible attorneys Michael G. Stag and Ashley M. Liuzza. Stag Liuzza, LLC is officed in New Orleans, LA, and our attorneys are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi.

Nothing on this site should be taken to establish an attorney-client relationship with us unless and until a contract for representation is signed. The attorneys of Stag Liuzza are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi and may associate counsel licensed in other jurisdictions as necessary.

Past results do not guarantee any similar result or outcome in your claim. Each claim is different.

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.