In 2015, the nation was horrified by the news coming out of Flint, Michigan. The small industrial city about an hour’s drive north from Detroit was poisoned by the reckless indifference of their public officials, and the contaminated water those officials allowed to course through the corroded pipes of the midwestern city. In 2014, the City switched the source of its water from the Detroit system to the Flint River as a cost saving measure. The decision was a disaster, causing the outbreak of legionnaire’s disease, and a sizable increase in the number of children whose blood tested positive for lead.

 Despite the national furor over the scandal, largely nothing was done for years to help the people of Flint secure the relief they rightfully deserved. However, in 2020, a breakthrough occurred. One that may have positive legal consequences for plaintiffs who are harmed by the reckless indifference of their local governments as it relates to environmental contamination. In May of last year, the United States Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals upheld a district court’s decision to deny “qualified immunity” to the state actors in Michigan responsible for the Flint water crisis. The Court held that Michigan officials’ conduct “shock[ed] the conscience” and that they could not avoid liability for damages using governmental immunity.

            This ruling is a breath of fresh air for plaintiffs harmed by the reckless and deliberate indifference of public officials. And it stands in stark contrast to another case involving government sanctioned environmental catastrophe: the toxic clean-up of the 9/11 terrorist attacks. In that case, Lombardi v. Whitman, five 9/11 rescue workers sued the EPA administrator for civil rights violations allegedly caused by the agency’s deliberate indifference to their health. The plaintiffs alleged the EPA knowingly concealed facts about the toxicity of the rubble, so that the cleanup could happen unabated. The Second Circuit affirmed a district court’s dismissal of the claims under the theory that EPA officials’ decisions “did not shock the conscience.”

            The Sixth Circuit’s decision, as well as the recent indictments of Former Michigan Governor Rick Snyder and others involved in the Flint water crisis, give hope to those environmentally harmed by the deliberate indifference of public officials. In the wake of the Sixth Circuit’s decision, the State of Michigan and the City of Flint agreed to settle with the victims for $641,000,000.

            Around the country, environmental tragedies like that of Flint are occurring every day. The Sixth Circuit’s decision should give hope to those suffering due to the reckless disregard of their governmental entities and corporations.

            Stag Liuzza represents individuals nationwide in the fight for clean air, water, and land. If you believe you have an environmental case, please call us for a free consultation.

OUR team

We prefer doing to talking (except in court), We take the bull by the horns and give you clear and practical advice. Personal, to the point, and in plain language. Any questions? Feel free to call or to drop by.

After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.
After reviewing your medical costs, lost wages, and pain and suffering damages, we can help you understand what your case is worth and plan a road map going forward.

$1.056 billion verdict against Exxon Mobil

If you think you may have a claim and need legal help to hold those parties responsible for damage that they have caused, contact an attorney from our firm.

Stag Liuzza fights industry giants across the country and holds them accountable for their actions. We strive to ensure that communities have access to safe drinking water, clean air, and a healthy environment. is operated and provided by Stag Liuzza, LLC responsible attorneys Michael G. Stag and Ashley M. Liuzza. Stag Liuzza, LLC is officed in New Orleans, LA, and our attorneys are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi.

Nothing on this site should be taken to establish an attorney-client relationship with us unless and until a contract for representation is signed. The attorneys of Stag Liuzza are licensed in Louisiana and Mississippi and may associate counsel licensed in other jurisdictions as necessary.

Past results do not guarantee any similar result or outcome in your claim. Each claim is different.

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website.